My suggestion is to change the context of your business by changing the paradigm of your customers from addressing early adopters to addressing the early majority. The novelty of AI is slowly wearing off, and without finding utility for this technology, Rabbit will eventually end up in a box with old junk. “Nice toy, but I do not use it.”. To become a utility, Rabbit must solve real-life problems. My idea is to target people with ADHD. Just find a diagnosis criteria and add features that counteract them. The device will land as a productivity tool for regular people, but for neurodivergent people, it could be a lifesaver. The most important thing is not to think about every productivity hack as helpful. Those hacks might work, not work immediately, or have a reverse effect. Consult with someone about what is a good idea and what is not. Imagine a rabbit creating a meditation. Maybe Pomodoro will work on someone; for me, it is a reason to lose focus. etc.
I feel that there are many applications of AI that can be discovered by using Rabbit R1. This versatile cornucopia of prospects, when orchestrated, can become a great instrument.
I wonder, can Rabbit R1 act as an instrument to tailor the way that AI will interact with the user? What d vice can act as a ‘reset’ function if this design is rendered counterintuitive? Can this forum define any physical ‘fail-safe’ to prevent a permanent molding of AI interface?
I think it’s like everything in life, movement means life and there’s still a lot of movement in r1, so we can be excited about what life with r1 will bring us. But I think there will certainly be a lot more happening in relation to these topics. There are several topics here that go in similar directions.